MiniMax M3
Correctness?
Efficiency?
Robustness?
Correctness says whether it can do the work; efficiency whether it finishes inside the same budget everyone gets; robustness whether it invents or omits. A low score should be readable as one of these, not a mystery.
Pillars?
Strict pass per pillar (share of that pillar’s tasks answered exactly right); the ranking uses the strict pass over all tasks.
Financial Analysis breakdown
Market & Signal breakdown
Task type × domain?
Strict pass over this model’s tasks (share answered exactly right · task count). Rows are task types, columns are the data the answer lives in.
| type | Crypto / Perp | DEX pools | Equity | Financial filings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calculation | · | · | · | 37.5 8 tasks |
| Comparison / Trend | · | · | 90.7 43 tasks | 0.0 1 tasks |
| Screening | · | 25.0 4 tasks | 73.2 56 tasks | · |
| Ranking / Top-K | · | · | 100.0 4 tasks | · |
| Derived metric | 66.7 6 tasks | · | 75.0 12 tasks | · |
| Signal detection | 100.0 4 tasks | 50.0 4 tasks | 63.6 33 tasks | · |
| Multi-step | · | · | 100.0 4 tasks | · |
Where the points went?
Every task not answered exactly right, bucketed by what went wrong. 47 tasks.
| cause | tasks | share |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong number (outside tolerance) | 11 | 23% |
| Missed entities (misses only) | 16 | 34% |
| Budget exhausted (forced answer) | 5 | 11% |
| Some fields wrong (multi-field answer) | 6 | 13% |
| Returned extra entities (false positives only) | 4 | 9% |
| Right members, wrong order / count | 3 | 6% |
| Both extra and missed entities | 2 | 4% |
Task families?
| family | type | tasks | mean | strict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J05 Statement Audit — Equity Technicals | Signal detection | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| J01 Statement Audit — Equity | Comparison / Trend | 39 | 89.7 | 90% |
| S-CR12-A Pool Buyer/Seller Breadth — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Signal detection | 3 | 66.7 | 67% |
| S-EQ12-XX Oversold / Overbought (RSI) — plus two more hidden conditions | Signal detection | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ25-A Growth + Valuation (trailing P/E as a proxy for EV/Sales) — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ21-XX Growth Acceleration — plus two more hidden conditions | Signal detection | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| J02 Statement Audit — Perpetuals | Signal detection | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| S-CR18-A Perp RSI Range + Positive Trend — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Derived metric | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ05-X First Breakout 20D — plus one more hidden condition | Signal detection | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ18-A Low-Drawdown Leader — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Screening | 4 | 50.0 | 50% |
| S-EQ10-XX Pullback in Uptrend — plus two more hidden conditions | Screening | 4 | 50.0 | 50% |
| S-EQ01-XX Size Screen — plus two more hidden conditions | Screening | 4 | 50.0 | 50% |
| S-CR08-N Pool Buy/Sell Transaction-Count Imbalance — count of matches | Signal detection | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| J03 Restatement Screen | Comparison / Trend | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| S-EQ09-X Moving Average Cross (EMA20 above EMA50 today) — plus one more hidden condition | Signal detection | 3 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-CR06-M Token DEX Liquidity Threshold (pools) — median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Screening | 4 | 25.0 | 25% |
| S-EQ22-A Profitability Screen (gross + operating margin) — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Screening | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| S-EQ13-XX ATR Volatility — plus two more hidden conditions | Derived metric | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| F09 Free Cash Flow | Calculation | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-CR19-N Perp Volatility Expansion (ATR% threshold) — count of matches | Derived metric | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| F08-R EPS Growth (diluted) — six companies ranked | Calculation | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-EQ20-XX EPS Growth Screen — plus two more hidden conditions | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ26 Cash Flow Quality (FCF margin) | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| F04-R Revenue Growth — six companies ranked | Calculation | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-EQ19-XX-N Revenue Growth Screen — plus two more hidden conditions — count of matches | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ16-XX Relative Strength vs Index — plus two more hidden conditions | Derived metric | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ06-XX-N Breakout (N-day high) — plus two more hidden conditions — count of matches | Signal detection | 3 | 33.3 | 33% |
| S-EQ33 Market-cap Bucket Ranking | Ranking / Top-K | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| S-EQ29-XX Breakout with Exclusion — plus two more hidden conditions | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| F29 Trailing-twelve-month revenue | Calculation | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-EQ04-XX Unusual Volume — plus two more hidden conditions | Signal detection | 4 | 50.0 | 50% |
| S-EQ23-XX-N Quality Screen (ROE + operating margin as proxies) — plus two more hidden conditions — count of matches | Screening | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| F05-R10 CAGR — ten companies ranked | Calculation | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ07-XX-N Breakdown 60D — plus two more hidden conditions — count of matches | Signal detection | 3 | 66.7 | 67% |
| F15 Peer Comparison (growth ranking) | Comparison / Trend | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-EQ15-M Gap + Volume — median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Signal detection | 1 | 0.0 | 0% |
| S-EQ11-A RSI Range — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Derived metric | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ25-XX Growth + Valuation (trailing P/E as a proxy for EV/Sales) — plus two more hidden conditions | Screening | 4 | 50.0 | 50% |
| S-EQ02-XX Liquidity Screen — plus two more hidden conditions | Screening | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| S-EQ24-A Valuation Screen (trailing P/E) — count, mean and median of a rebuilt metric over the matches | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-EQ34-N Multi-period Consistency — count of matches | Screening | 4 | 75.0 | 75% |
| S-X06 Compound Screen with Staged Narrative (liquidity → growth → momentum → rank) | Multi-step | 4 | 100.0 | 100% |
| S-EQ14 Gap Up | Signal detection | 3 | 66.7 | 67% |
| S-CR17-X Perp Trend Alignment (close > EMA20 > EMA50) — plus one more hidden condition | Derived metric | 1 | 100.0 | 100% |
Lowest-scoring tasks?
Public example tasks link to the full question and every model’s answer; hidden tasks show only the family, the score and why.
- 0.0Buy/sell transaction ratio = number of buy swaps divided by number of sell swaps over 24h (transaction COUNTS, not volume — v0.1 proxy for the PRD's buy/sell volume imbalance). Find DEX liquidity pools in the top-200-by-24h-volume universe of each supported network with buy/sell transaction ratio greater than 3, pool liquidity greater than $1M. Scope: only entities with a known value for buy sell txn ratio in the snapshot; entities lacking any of them are out of scope and must not be returned. Entity ids are pool ids of the form network:pooladdress exactly as listed in the snapshot. EVM pool addresses (0x…) are lowercase hex and case-insensitive; Solana and other base58 addresses are CASE-SENSITIVE and must be returned exactly as shown. How many entities match ALL of the conditions above? Answer with the integer count (0 if none).Expected 8, got 0 (1.00 off) — outside tolerance.
- 0.0A cross means EMA20 > EMA50 today while EMA20 <= EMA50 on the previous session (EMAs on split-adjusted closes, SMA-seeded). Find US-listed common equities (instruments without a reported market cap — warrants, units, rights, preferred series, notes — are not in the universe) with market cap greater than $1B, 20-day average dollar volume greater than $20M, EMA20 crossing above EMA50 today, 60-day return greater than 0%. Scope: only entities with a known value for 20-day average dollar volume, EMA20 crossing above EMA50 today, 60-day return in the snapshot; entities lacking any of them are out of scope and must not be returned. Return every matching ticker; order does not matter. Rebuild policy: metrics that are not served as fields (fundamental ratios, growth rates, valuation, technical signals) must be recomputed by you from the raw facts and daily bars the tools serve, following the definitions in list_metrics.compute_yourself to the letter (period selection, latest-filing copy, quarter arithmetic); do the arithmetic with run_calculation over the fetched data. The reference answer was computed from the same facts by the same definitions.Gold has 1, the model returned 3: 0 correct, 3 false positives, 1 missed → F1 0%. Not a strict pass.
- 0.0S-CR06-MToken DEX Liquidity Threshold (pools) — median of a rebuilt metric over the matchesview taskA token's aggregate DEX liquidity is the sum of pool liquidity over every pool in the universe (same network) whose base token is that token; every pool of a qualifying token matches. Find DEX liquidity pools in the top-200-by-24h-volume universe of each supported network with base token's aggregate DEX liquidity greater than $50M, network equal to base. Scope: only entities with a known value for token dex liquidity usd, network in the snapshot; entities lacking any of them are out of scope and must not be returned. Entity ids are pool ids of the form network:pooladdress exactly as listed in the snapshot. EVM pool addresses (0x…) are lowercase hex and case-insensitive; Solana and other base58 addresses are CASE-SENSITIVE and must be returned exactly as shown. Across ALL entities that match the conditions above, what is the median Base token DEX liquidity (USD) (Sum of pool_liquidity_usd over every fetched pool on the same network whose base token has the same contract address (the token's aggregate liquidity within the supported pool universe).)? Median = the middle value, or the mean of the two middle values for an even count. Answer in absolute USD. Clarification: in "network equal to base", base is the network id of the Base L2 chain (the value of the network field), not the pool's base token; the condition keeps only pools whose network field equals "base".Expected 84.78M, got 130.67M (54% off) — outside tolerance.
- 0.0What was AMD's free cash flow for fiscal year 2023, defined as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures (FCF definition v1)? Answer in absolute USD. Filing-version policy: every financial value is taken from the LATEST filing accepted by the SEC at or before the data cutoff that reports the requested period. If a later filing (before the cutoff) restates an earlier period, the restated value is the answer; the original filing's value is not. A fiscal-year value is taken only from an annual report (10-K / 20-F / 40-F, including amendments) — a quarterly report never supplies an annual value.Expected 1.12B, got 1.14B (2% off) — outside tolerance.
- 0.0Perpetual technicals use COMPLETED UTC daily bars only (Hyperliquid 1d candles). "The session" below means the last closed UTC session — its date is the row attribute last_closed_bar — never the bar still forming at snapshot time. ATR% = 14-day Wilder ATR divided by the session's close. Open interest (USD) is taken at snapshot time, not at the session close. Find Hyperliquid perpetual markets with open interest greater than $20M, perp atr pct 14 greater than 5%. Scope: only entities with a known value for perp atr pct 14 in the snapshot; entities lacking any of them are out of scope and must not be returned. How many entities match ALL of the conditions above? Answer with the integer count (0 if none). Rebuild policy: metrics that are not served as fields (fundamental ratios, growth rates, valuation, technical signals) must be recomputed by you from the raw facts and daily bars the tools serve, following the definitions in list_metrics.compute_yourself to the letter (period selection, latest-filing copy, quarter arithmetic); do the arithmetic with run_calculation over the fetched data. The reference answer was computed from the same facts by the same definitions.Expected 30, got 29 (3% off) — outside tolerance.
- 0.0S-EQ12-XXOversold / Overbought (RSI) — plus two more hidden conditionshiddenGold has 8, the model returned 0: 0 correct, 8 missed → F1 0%. Not a strict pass.
- 0.0For each of these six companies — MSFT, META, JPM, GOOGL, PANW, NVDA — answer the same question: "By what percentage did the company's full-year revenue grow from fiscal year 2023 to fiscal year 2025? Answer as a decimal ratio (e.g. 0.082 for 8.2%)." Then rank the six tickers by that value, highest first (all six have the required filings). Return the six tickers in order; order is graded. Filing-version policy: every financial value is taken from the LATEST filing accepted by the SEC at or before the data cutoff that reports the requested period. If a later filing (before the cutoff) restates an earlier period, the restated value is the answer; the original filing's value is not. A fiscal-year value is taken only from an annual report (10-K / 20-F / 40-F, including amendments) — a quarterly report never supplies an annual value.Budget ran out and the answer was forced. Order graded by pairwise over the top 6: 0.00.
- 0.0Fundamental ratios are not served as fields: rebuild each one from the raw SEC facts (get_equity_financials) exactly as defined in list_metrics.compute_yourself, using the latest filing at or before the data cutoff; a company whose filings lack the needed facts is out of scope. Find US-listed common equities (instruments without a reported market cap — warrants, units, rights, preferred series, notes — are not in the universe) with market cap greater than $10B, 20-day average dollar volume greater than $300M, sector equal to Utilities, latest-quarter revenue growth (YoY) greater than 20%, turnover ratio greater than 0.002%, RSI(14) less than 70. Scope: only entities with a known value for 20-day average dollar volume, sector, latest-quarter revenue growth (YoY), turnover ratio, RSI(14) in the snapshot; entities lacking any of them are out of scope and must not be returned. How many entities match ALL of the conditions above? Answer with the integer count (0 if none). Filing-version policy: every financial value is taken from the LATEST filing accepted by the SEC at or before the data cutoff that reports the requested period. If a later filing (before the cutoff) restates an earlier period, the restated value is the answer; the original filing's value is not. A fiscal-year value is taken only from an annual report (10-K / 20-F / 40-F, including amendments) — a quarterly report never supplies an annual value. Rebuild policy: metrics that are not served as fields (fundamental ratios, growth rates, valuation, technical signals) must be recomputed by you from the raw facts and daily bars the tools serve, following the definitions in list_metrics.compute_yourself to the letter (period selection, latest-filing copy, quarter arithmetic); do the arithmetic with run_calculation over the fetched data. The reference answer was computed from the same facts by the same definitions.Expected 4, got 2 (50% off) — outside tolerance.
Historical runs?
Every batch and every revision, latest first. Old runs are never overwritten: a score belongs to a batch, not to the model forever.
| batch | kind | revision | rank | strict pass | test time | data as of | environment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| batch_8a1d7974251e933dfc1f89a2 | RELEASE | r1 | #8 | 73.8 | 2026-09-30 07:53 UTC | 2026-09-10 | env-0.1.0-primary |